🔗 Share this article

During the previous presidential campaign, Donald Trump courted the electorate with pledges to lower prices immediately upon taking office. But, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay precious little focus to affordability issues. This shifted following price-fatigued voters expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration launched a slapdash effort to address affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with illogical claims, inconsistencies, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Just two days after the election, the president began his cost-reduction push with a poorly received statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from the wealthy leader—who frequently associates with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he dismissed their concerns as unimportant, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion that everything was “way down” proved absurdly obtuse and dishonest. How could all costs be decreasing when his cherished tariffs were increasing costs? Official statistics show banana prices increased 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee surged 18.9%—in part due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, costs increased in five of the six food categories tracked by the Consumer Price Index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Inaccuracies in Economic Statements

In spite of these numbers, the president persists in repeating his misleading narrative about affordability. After the vote, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “prices are way down,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks contradict the reality that prices overall have clearly increased since Biden left office. At present, price growth is running at a 3% annual rate, which is 50% higher than the central bank’s 2% goal. Adding to the inaccuracies, he claimed that fuel costs had fallen to around two dollars, even though government figures indicate they are $3.19.

Faced with reality and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. Many citizens are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Effects

As certain taxes reduced on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will likely claim that he has lowered costs once these products start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a fire that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing McDonald’s executives, Trump stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and assured the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when millions risk cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

According to a recent poll from October, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while only 26% rate them positive. Another poll showed that a majority of citizens say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Steps

Scott Bessent, the president’s top economic official, lately disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost approximately tens of thousands of positions this year. Citing this weakness, Bessent urged the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, the president suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” To numerous households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that lawmakers—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve such a plan. The scheme would likely raise government expenditure, push up interest rates, and possibly fuel inflation by putting more money into the economy.

Another supposed fix for cost issues involved introducing half-century home loans, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to lower monthly payments—often reducing them by just $100 or $200 each month. The downside is that these loans could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Financial Prospects

In their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have again blamed Biden for economic problems, such as rising prices. Spokespeople claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” These are unfounded and inaccurate allegations. In reality, the former president handed over a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. However, the current administration’s actions—especially import taxes—have resulted in an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

Per Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if key regions such as California and New York enter a downturn, the US could slide into a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers generally possess less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted cost initiative probably ineffective to hold down prices, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might end up triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that struggling Americans cannot handle.