🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.