🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered favorable results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."