🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I traditionally avoided significant use of randomization during my D&D sessions. I tended was for story direction and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. That said, I opted to alter my method, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing a Custom Mechanic

A popular actual-play show features a DM who often requests "chance rolls" from the participants. This involves selecting a type of die and assigning potential outcomes based on the number. This is fundamentally no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these are devised spontaneously when a character's decision has no predetermined outcome.

I chose to experiment with this technique at my own session, mostly because it seemed engaging and provided a change from my normal practice. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated tension between preparation and randomization in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional Story Beat

In a recent session, my players had just emerged from a city-wide fight. Afterwards, a cleric character asked about two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. In place of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both would perish; on a 5-9, a single one would die; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a deeply emotional moment where the characters came upon the corpses of their companions, still clasped together in their final moments. The party held last rites, which was especially significant due to prior roleplaying. In a concluding touch, I decided that the NPCs' bodies were miraculously transformed, revealing a enchanted item. I randomized, the bead's contained spell was exactly what the party lacked to address another pressing story problem. It's impossible to plan these kinds of serendipitous moments.

Honing DM Agility

This incident made me wonder if improvisation and thinking on your feet are truly the beating heart of D&D. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Players often take delight in derailing the most detailed plans. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate content in real-time.

Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to develop these skills without straying too much outside your usual style. The trick is to use them for minor decisions that don't fundamentally change the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. Instead, I could use it to determine whether the characters enter a room moments before a major incident takes place.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

This technique also helps make players feel invested and foster the impression that the game world is alive, evolving in reaction to their actions as they play. It reduces the feeling that they are merely actors in a DM's sole script, thereby enhancing the cooperative aspect of storytelling.

This approach has long been integral to the original design. Early editions were reliant on encounter generators, which suited a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. While contemporary D&D tends to emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the only path.

Finding the Right Balance

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. Yet, it's also fine no issue with stepping back and permitting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Direction is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We use it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

My final suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of control. Embrace a little improvisation for inconsequential outcomes. You might just discover that the organic story beat is significantly more powerful than anything you would have scripted on your own.